Perez v. Pearl
This text of 411 So. 2d 972 (Perez v. Pearl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Juan PEREZ, As Administrator of the Estate of Johnny Perez, a Minor, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
Miriam J. PEARL and K.S.T.O. Corporation, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Ratiner & Glinn, Miami, for appellant.
Lyons & Smith and Allen Kominsky, Miami, John Kirk McDonald, Coral Gables, and Claudia B. Greenberg, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
NESBITT, Judge.
Like the threat of a lawsuit or the filing of a complaint, a judgment establishing liability but not determining or fixing any monetary amount of damages does not constitute a cognizable lien pursuant to Section 55.10, Florida Statutes (1979). It is simply an expectancy.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
411 So. 2d 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-pearl-fladistctapp-1982.