Perez v. Pearl

411 So. 2d 972
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 1982·No. 81-562·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

411 So.2d 972 (1982)

Juan PEREZ, As Administrator of the Estate of Johnny Perez, a Minor, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
Miriam J. PEARL and K.S.T.O. Corporation, Appellees.

No. 81-562.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 30, 1982.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Ratiner & Glinn, Miami, for appellant.

Lyons & Smith and Allen Kominsky, Miami, John Kirk McDonald, Coral Gables, and Claudia B. Greenberg, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

NESBITT, Judge.

Like the threat of a lawsuit or the filing of a complaint, a judgment establishing liability but not determining or fixing any monetary amount of damages does not constitute a cognizable lien pursuant to Section 55.10, Florida Statutes (1979). It is simply an expectancy.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. Pearl, 411 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

411 So. 2d 972 (Perez v. Pearl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Penzell v. M & M Construction Group Corp.
915 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Gotch v. Wald (In re Wald)
248 B.R. 642 (M.D. Florida, 1998)
Bakalarz v. Luskin
560 So. 2d 283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)