Perez v. Molina

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 17, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-00801·Unknown

Opinion

aa DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | DOC #: JARRELL D. PEREZ, DATE FILED: 10/17/2023 Plaintiff, 23-CV-801 (JHR) (BCM) -against- ORDER OF SERVICE LOUIS MOLINA, et al., Defendants.

BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, who currently is incarcerated at Franklin Correctional Facility, brings this pro se action alleging violations of his constitutional rights during his detention on Rikers Island. By order dated March 14, 2023, Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain granted Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis, that is, without prepayment of fees. By order dated June 20, 2023, (Dkt. 5), Chief Judge Swain directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint, and on September 22, 2023, the Clerk’s Office received Plaintiff's amended pleading. (Dkt. 8.) The action was reassigned on October 13, 2023, to Judge Jennifer H. Rearden, who referred the case to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for general pretrial management the same day. (Dkt. 9.) As set forth below, this order (1) advises the parties concerning Judge Moses's Individual Practices; (2) requests that defendants waive service of process; (3) applies Local Civil Rule 33.2 to this action; and (4) refers plaintiff to the New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG). General Pretrial Management All pretrial motions and applications, including those related to scheduling and discovery (but excluding motions to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings, for injunctive relief, for summary judgment, or for class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23) must be made to Judge Moses and in compliance with this Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, available on the Court's website at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-barbara-moses and attached to this Order.

Parties and counsel are cautioned: 1. Once a discovery schedule has been issued, all discovery must be initiated in time to be concluded by the close of discovery set by the Court. 2. Discovery applications, including letter-motions requesting discovery conferences, must be made promptly after the need for such an application arises and must comply with Local

Civil Rule 37.2 and § 2(b) of Judge Moses's Individual Practices. It is the Court's practice to decide discovery disputes at the Rule 37.2 conference, based on the parties' letters, unless a party requests or the Court requires more formal briefing. Absent extraordinary circumstances, discovery applications made later than 30 days prior to the close of discovery may be denied as untimely. 3. For motions other than discovery motions, pre-motion conferences are not required, but may be requested where counsel believe that an informal conference with the Court may obviate the need for a motion or narrow the issues. 4. Requests to adjourn a court conference or other court proceeding (including a telephonic court conference) or to extend a deadline must be made in writing and in compliance

with § 2(a) of Judge Moses's Individual Practices. Telephone requests for adjournments or extensions will not be entertained. 5. In accordance with § 1(d) of Judge Moses's Individual Practices, letters and letter- motions are limited to four pages, exclusive of attachments. Courtesy copies of letters and letter- motions filed via ECF are required only if the filing contains voluminous attachments. Courtesy copies should be delivered promptly, should bear the ECF header generated at the time of electronic filing, and should include tabs for the attachments. Waiver of Service The Court requests that the City of New York, Commissioner Louis Molina, Warden Ronald Miller, Deputy Warden Brathwaite, Captain Mulbrav, Captain Smith, and Captain Shaw waive service of summons. Local Civil Rule 33.2

Local Civil Rule 33.2, which requires defendants in certain types of prisoner cases to respond to specific, court-ordered discovery requests, applies to this action. Those discovery requests are available on the Court’s website under "Forms" and are entitled "Plaintiff’s Local Civil Rule 33.2 Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents." Within 120 days of service of the complaint (or waiver of service), defendants must serve responses to these standard discovery requests. In their responses, defendants must quote each request verbatim. Pro Se Filings and the NYLAG Clinic Plaintiff is hereby notified that pro se parties may file pleadings, letters, and other documents with the Court by using any of the following methods:

a. Drop off the documents in the drop box located in the lobby of the U.S. Courthouse at 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY, 10007. b. Mail the documents to the Pro Se Intake Unit in Room 105 in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007. c. Email the documents to Temporary_Pro_Se_Filing@nysd.uscourts.gov. Instructions for filing documents by email may be found on the Court's website at nysd.uscourts.gov/forms/instructions-filing-documents-email. Plaintiff may wish to contact the New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG) Clinic for Pro Se Litigants in the Southern District of New York, which is a free legal clinic staffed by attorneys and paralegals to assist those who are representing themselves in civil lawsuits in this court. The clinic is run by a private organization; it is not part of, or run by, the Court. It cannot accept filings on behalf of the Court, which must still be made by any pro se party through the Pro Se Intake Unit. To receive limited-scope assistance from the clinic, plaintiff may complete the clinic's intake form, which is attached to this Order, and mail it to the provided address. If plaintiff has questions regarding the form or is unable to complete it, they may leave a voicemail at (212) 659- 6190. A copy of a flyer with details about the clinic is attached to this Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to electronically notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department of this Order. Dated: New York, New York October 17, 2023 SO ORDERED.

United States Magistrate Judge

September 6, 2022

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARBARA MOSES

Chambers Courtroom Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse 500 Pearl Street, Room 740 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 20A New York, NY 10007 Courtroom Deputy: Tamika Kay Telephone: (212) 805-0228 Dedicated AT&T Teleconference Line 888-557-8511 Access Code: 7746387

Civil cases come before magistrate judges in two ways: (i) for one or more specific purposes, pursuant to an order of reference by the assigned district judge, or (ii) for all purposes, on consent of the parties, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). When a district judge approves an all-purposes consent form signed by counsel, the magistrate judge assumes the role of the district judge. The right to a jury trial is preserved and any appeal is directly to the Court of Appeals.

It is the uniform practice of the magistrate judges in the Southern District of New York to schedule civil trials for firm dates, rather than using a trailing trial calendar or requiring counsel to be available for trial on short notice. Additionally, because magistrate judges rarely try criminal cases, such firm trial dates are unlikely to be changed to accommodate criminal trials. Should the parties wish to have Judge Moses preside over their case for all purposes, including trial, the necessary form is available at: http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judge/Moses.

Unless otherwise ordered by Judge Moses, the following practices are applicable to all civil matters conducted before her, whether by reference or on consent:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. Molina, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Perez v. Molina (Perez v. Molina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)