Perez v. Maule Industries, Inc.

411 So. 2d 960, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19652
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 1982·No. Nos. 80-54 to 80-56, 80-58·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents the same issue considered by this court in Goldberg v. Context Industries, Inc., 362 So.2d 974 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 370 So.2d 459 (Fla.1979),1 — whether an injured worker may recover worker’s compensation benefits against a wholly owned subsidiary corporation then bring a separate tort action against the parent corporation though both parent and the subsidiary are covered under the same worker’s compensation policy. On authority of Goldberg, supra, we again affirm the summary judgment granted in favor of the parent corporation.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. Maule Industries, Inc., 411 So. 2d 960, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19652 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

411 So. 2d 960 (Perez v. Maule Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Western Knapp Engineering Co. v. Maule Industries, Inc.
452 So. 2d 1050 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Perez v. Maule Industries, Inc.
421 So. 2d 515 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Carter v. Peninsular Fire Ins. Co.
411 So. 2d 960 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Perez v. Universal Engineering Corp.
413 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)