Perez v. Lopez

454 So. 2d 777
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 28, 1984
Docket84-212
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 454 So. 2d 777 (Perez v. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perez v. Lopez, 454 So. 2d 777 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

454 So.2d 777 (1984)

Elsa Lopez PEREZ, Appellant,
v.
Amanda Perez LOPEZ, Appellee.

No. 84-212.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 28, 1984.

*778 Pestcoe, Slotnick & Garcia and Michael Slotnick, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Simon, Schindler & Hurst and Thomas M. Pflaum, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The order under review was properly entered insofar as it acted to "freeze" or marshal assets — including corporate stock — in which the decedent may have had an interest, pending further order of the probate court in the administration of his estate. See Estate of Conger v. Conger, 414 So.2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). To the extent, however, that it directly restrains the corporations themselves, which were not made parties to the proceedings below, it is overbroad, see Gettinger v. Gettinger, 165 So.2d 757 (Fla. 1964), and should be modified to correct this defect after remand.

Affirmed as modified.[1]

NOTES

[1] This opinion does not affect the lower court's continuing authority, as specifically recognized by the trial judge, to modify the "freeze" order, if appropriate or necessary, upon application of any interested party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bankatlantic v. Estate of Glatzer
61 So. 3d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
In Re Estate of Barsanti
773 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Diana v. Bentsen
677 So. 2d 1374 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Nahar v. Nahar
656 So. 2d 225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Marvin Johnson, P.C. v. Superior Court
887 P.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1994)
Friedman v. Cohan
501 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
454 So. 2d 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-lopez-fladistctapp-1984.