Perez v. Larson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOEL PEREZ, : Civil No. 3:19-cv-1015 SOMANTTON Plaintiff (Judge Mariani) SEP 8 0 2020
JAMES J. LARSON, et al, : Defendants □ ORDER AND NOW, this 2d gy of September, 2020, upon consideration of the Court's Memorandum and Order (Docs. 52, 53), granting the motion (Doc. 29) to dismiss by Correct Care Solutions, LLC, affording Plaintiff the opportunity to amend his claims against Correct Care, but forewarning him that failure to timely file a properly supported amended complaint would result in dismissal of this action without further notice of Court, and upon further consideration of Plaintiff's failure to file a proposed amended complaint, it is clear that Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court Order (Doc. 53), or adhere to the standards set forth therein, and that because Plaintiff refuses to comply with the Court Order, this action is subject to dismissal, see Donnelly v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 677 F.2d 339, 340-41 (3d Cir. 1982) (recognizing that a district court may sua sponte dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court orders); /seley v. Bitner, 216 F. App’x 252, 255 (3d Cir. 2007) (finding that dismissal by the court on its own initiative is warranted where plaintiff fails to comply with court orders directing adherence to rules governing joinder of parties
and claims) (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-631 (1962)), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The claims against Correct Care Solutions, LLC are DISMISSED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 3. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a}(3).
□□ oF Ye bY LLCbED Robert D. Mariani United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perez v. Larson (Perez v. Larson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.