Perez v. Holt

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Perez v. Holt

633 So. 2d 866, 93 La.App. 3 Cir. 781, 1994 La. App. LEXIS 508, 1994 WL 65237

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 2, 1994

DocketNo. 93-781

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 633 So. 2d 866 (Perez v. Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perez v. Holt, 633 So. 2d 866, 93 La.App. 3 Cir. 781, 1994 La. App. LEXIS 508, 1994 WL 65237 (La. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinions

YELVERTON, Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated ease of Dubroc v. Allstate Insurance Co., 633 So.2d 864 (La.App. 3d Cir.1994) (93-780), we find the trial court was correct in granting Sheriff Hilton’s exception of no cause of action. However, the trial judge gave the plaintiffs no opportunity to amend. We accordingly remand to the trial court with the instruction that an order be issued to Connie Perez to amend her petition to state a cause of action against the Sheriff, if she can, within a delay deemed reasonable by the trial court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. The plaintiff-appellant will pay the costs of her appeal.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

YELVERTON, Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated ease of Dubroc v. Allstate Insurance Co., 633 So.2d 864 (La.App. 3d Cir.1994) (93-780), we find the trial court was correct in granting Sheriff Hilton’s exception of no cause of action. However, the trial judge gave the plaintiffs no opportunity to amend. We accordingly remand to the trial court with the instruction that an order be issued to Connie Perez to amend her petition to state a cause of action against the Sheriff, if she can, within a delay deemed reasonable by the trial court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. The plaintiff-appellant will pay the costs of her appeal.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

633 So. 2d 866, 93 La.App. 3 Cir. 781, 1994 La. App. LEXIS 508, 1994 WL 65237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-holt-lactapp-1994.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack