Perez v. Holland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Perez v. Holland

142 S.W.2d 1119

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedAugust 1, 1940

DocketNo. 11140

StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.W.2d 1119 (Perez v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perez v. Holland, 142 S.W.2d 1119 (Tex. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The application of relator for writ of mandamus was set for hearing on July 29, 1940, but both relator and respondents failed to appear except by said application and by answer of respondents, and' by briefs filed herein. The Hon. William M. Holland has filed by way of answer a full statement of facts which is not disputed, which, in our opinion, requires, as a matter of law, that the application for the writ of mandamus be refused, and it is hereby refused.

Refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The application of relator for writ of mandamus was set for hearing on July 29, 1940, but both relator and respondents failed to appear except by said application and by answer of respondents, and' by briefs filed herein. The Hon. William M. Holland has filed by way of answer a full statement of facts which is not disputed, which, in our opinion, requires, as a matter of law, that the application for the writ of mandamus be refused, and it is hereby refused.

Refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 S.W.2d 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-holland-texapp-1940.