Perez v. Hempstead Motor Sales, Ltd.
176 Misc. 2d 314, 674 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 214
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 11, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 176 Misc. 2d 314 (Perez v. Hempstead Motor Sales, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Perez v. Hempstead Motor Sales, Ltd., 176 Misc. 2d 314, 674 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 214 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously affirmed with $10 costs.
[315]*315We conclude that denial of the motion for summary judgment was proper. In addition, we note that this appeal was not frivolous.
Ingrassia, J. P., Floyd and Levitt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Inc.
178 F. Supp. 2d 198 (E.D. New York, 2001)
Karlin v. IVF America, Inc.
712 N.E.2d 662 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 Misc. 2d 314, 674 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-hempstead-motor-sales-ltd-nyappterm-1998.