Perez v. H & J Transfer

683 So. 2d 191, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12314, 1996 WL 670293
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 1996·No. No. 96-665·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A review of the record demonstrates that Appellant has not asserted good cause why his appeal to the Commission should be reinstated. Compare Applegate v. National Health Care Affiliates, Inc., 667 So.2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)(reverse and remand for healing to determine if appellant’s failure to timely file appeal was due to late receipt of order appealed from); Holmes v. City of West Palm Beach, 627 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)(same).

Dismissal affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. H & J Transfer, 683 So. 2d 191, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12314, 1996 WL 670293 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

683 So. 2d 191 (Perez v. H & J Transfer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. NAT. HEALTH CARE
667 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Holmes v. City of West Palm Beach
627 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)