Perez v. H & J Transfer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perez v. H & J Transfer

683 So. 2d 191, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12314, 1996 WL 670293

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 20, 1996

DocketNo. 96-665

StatusPublished

This text of 683 So. 2d 191 (Perez v. H & J Transfer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perez v. H & J Transfer, 683 So. 2d 191, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12314, 1996 WL 670293 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A review of the record demonstrates that Appellant has not asserted good cause why his appeal to the Commission should be reinstated. Compare Applegate v. National Health Care Affiliates, Inc., 667 So.2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)(reverse and remand for healing to determine if appellant’s failure to timely file appeal was due to late receipt of order appealed from); Holmes v. City of West Palm Beach, 627 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)(same).

Dismissal affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A review of the record demonstrates that Appellant has not asserted good cause why his appeal to the Commission should be reinstated. Compare Applegate v. National Health Care Affiliates, Inc., 667 So.2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)(reverse and remand for healing to determine if appellant’s failure to timely file appeal was due to late receipt of order appealed from); Holmes v. City of West Palm Beach, 627 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)(same).

Dismissal affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

683 So. 2d 191, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12314, 1996 WL 670293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-h-j-transfer-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack