Perez v. Grey

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided September 3, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-00095·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE

9 10 DANIEL PEREZ, CASE NO. C21-0095JLR-DWC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMENDATION 12 KATHRYN GREY, et al., 13 Defendants. 14

15 This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation of United 16 States Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. (R&R (Dkt. # 52).) Having carefully 17 reviewed the Report and Recommendation, all other relevant documents, and the 18 governing law, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 52) and 19 DENIES Plaintiff Daniel Jay Perez’s second motion for a temporary restraining order and 20 preliminary injunction (Dkt. # 46). 21 A district court has jurisdiction to review a Magistrate Judge’s report and 22 recommendation on dispositive matters. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). “The district judge must 1 determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly 2 objected to.” Id. Thus, the court reviews de novo only those portions of the report and 3 recommendation to which specific written objection is made. United States v.

4 Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). When no objections are 5 filed, the court need not review de novo the report and recommendation. Wang v. 6 Masaitis, 416 F.3d 992, 1000 n.13 (9th Cir. 2005). 7 Here, no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. (See Dkt.) Thus, 8 the court need not review de novo the Report and Recommendation. See Wang, 416 F.3d

9 at 1000. Moreover, the court has examined the record, including the Report and 10 Recommendation, and finds the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning persuasive in light of that 11 record. Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. 12 Mr. Perez’s second motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is 13 DENIED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send copies of this order to the parties and to

14 Magistrate Judge Christel. 15 Dated this 3rd day of September, 2021. 16 A 17 18 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 19 20 21 22

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. Grey, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Perez v. Grey (Perez v. Grey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
416 F.3d 1 (D.C. Circuit, 2005)
Michael Wang v. Robert Masaitis, U.S. Marshal
416 F.3d 992 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)