Perez v. Gasho of Japan, Inc.

136 A.D.3d 427, 23 N.Y.S.3d 883
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 2016·No. 112 306126/11·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered January 9, 2014, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the complaint was warranted in this action where plaintiffs allege that infant plaintiff tripped over a bump in a carpet runner in defendants’ restaurant. The record shows *428 that the subject defect was trivial and not actionable, where infant plaintiff’s mother described the runner as being “bunched up . . .a little,” with “a little lump” (see Hutchinson v Sheridan Hill House Corp., 26 NY3d 66 [2015]; Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976 [1997]; see also Kwitny v Westchester Towers Owners Corp., 47 AD3d 495 [1st Dept 2008]). There is no further detail in the record regarding the alleged defect.

Plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are unavailing.

Concur— Saxe, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter and Peinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. Gasho of Japan, Inc., 136 A.D.3d 427, 23 N.Y.S.3d 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

136 A.D.3d 427 (Perez v. Gasho of Japan, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trincere v. County of Suffolk
688 N.E.2d 489 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp.
41 N.E.3d 766 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
Kwitny v. Westchester Towers Owners Corp.
47 A.D.3d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)