Perez v. Freightliner Trucks of South Florida, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perez v. Freightliner Trucks of South Florida, Inc.

802 So. 2d 515, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18556, 2001 WL 1671340

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 2001·No. No. 3D00-3606·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Frank Griffin Volkswagen v. Smith, 610 So.2d 597, 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (holding that “[WJhere a dealer has properly disclaimed all warranties, the delivering, presenting, or explaining of a manufacturer’s warranty, without more, does not render the dealer a co-warrantor by adoption.”); § 672.316, Fla. Stat. (1997); see also Equico Lessors, Inc. v. Ramadan, 493 So.2d 516, 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (holding that “Florida’s Uniform Commercial Code contains a provision that validates waiver of defenses clauses in contracts or leases.”); § 679.206(1), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Frank Griffin Volkswagen v. Smith, 610 So.2d 597, 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (holding that “[WJhere a dealer has properly disclaimed all warranties, the delivering, presenting, or explaining of a manufacturer’s warranty, without more, does not render the dealer a co-warrantor by adoption.”); § 672.316, Fla. Stat. (1997); see also Equico Lessors, Inc. v. Ramadan, 493 So.2d 516, 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (holding that “Florida’s Uniform Commercial Code contains a provision that validates waiver of defenses clauses in contracts or leases.”); § 679.206(1), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Perez v. Freightliner Trucks of South Florida, Inc., 802 So. 2d 515, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18556, 2001 WL 1671340 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

802 So. 2d 515 (Perez v. Freightliner Trucks of South Florida, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related