Perez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

760 So. 2d 1096, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8060, 2000 WL 826990
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2000·No. No. 3D99-3104·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jose M. Perez appeals from an order affirming the denial of unemployment compensation vocational training benefits. We affirm.

The record reveals that the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission is supported by substantial competent evidence. See Smith v. Krugmam-Kadi, 547 So.2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Moreover, this court must defer to the Agency’s interpretation of the requirements of the vocational training benefits program. See Public Employees Relations Comm’n v. Dade County Police Benevolent Ass’n, 467 So.2d 987 (Fla.1985).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 760 So. 2d 1096, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8060, 2000 WL 826990 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

760 So. 2d 1096 (Perez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES REL. v. Dade County Police
467 So. 2d 987 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Smith v. Krugman-Kadi
547 So. 2d 677 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)