Perez v. Fitzgerald
10 N.E.3d 1158, 23 N.Y.3d 949, 2014 NY Slip Op 71485, 987 N.Y.S.2d 602, 2014 WL 1813710, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 1028
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., 14 NY3d 748 [2010]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perez v. Fitzgerald, 10 N.E.3d 1158, 23 N.Y.3d 949, 2014 NY Slip Op 71485, 987 N.Y.S.2d 602, 2014 WL 1813710, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 1028 (N.Y. 2014).
10 N.E.3d 1158 (Perez v. Fitzgerald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cuadrado v. New York City Transit Authority
925 N.E.2d 83 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)