Perez v. Fitzgerald
10 N.E.3d 1158, 23 N.Y.3d 949, 2014 NY Slip Op 71485, 987 N.Y.S.2d 602, 2014 WL 1813710, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 1028
This text of 10 N.E.3d 1158 (Perez v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Perez v. Fitzgerald, 10 N.E.3d 1158, 23 N.Y.3d 949, 2014 NY Slip Op 71485, 987 N.Y.S.2d 602, 2014 WL 1813710, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 1028 (N.Y. 2014).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., 14 NY3d 748 [2010]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cuadrado v. New York City Transit Authority
925 N.E.2d 83 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 N.E.3d 1158, 23 N.Y.3d 949, 2014 NY Slip Op 71485, 987 N.Y.S.2d 602, 2014 WL 1813710, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 1028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-fitzgerald-ny-2014.