Perez v. Dubray

55 A.D.3d 1119, 865 N.Y.S.2d 765
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 23, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 55 A.D.3d 1119 (Perez v. Dubray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perez v. Dubray, 55 A.D.3d 1119, 865 N.Y.S.2d 765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

As the result of an incident in which a correction officer observed petitioner throw punches at another inmate, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assault. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Initially, we note that the matter was properly transferred to this Court inasmuch as the petition raises a question of substantial evidence (see Matter of Young v Selsky, 32 AD3d 598 [2006]). Turning to the merits, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officers familiar with the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Brown v Selsky, 49 AD3d 1108 [2008]; Matter of Peoples v Selsky, 33 AD3d 1179, 1180 [2006]). The contrary testimony of petitioner and his inmate witnesses presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Ramos v Selsky, 48 AD3d 863, 864 [2008]). In view of the foregoing, we find no reason to disturb the determination of guilt.

Spain, J.P, Carpinello, Rose, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pellot v. Fischer
67 A.D.3d 1231 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Smith v. Fischer
64 A.D.3d 1061 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Gimenez v. Artus
63 A.D.3d 1461 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
McLean v. Fischer
63 A.D.3d 1468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Edwards v. Venettozzi
61 A.D.3d 1224 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.D.3d 1119, 865 N.Y.S.2d 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-dubray-nyappdiv-2008.