Perez v. County of Kern

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 26, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-00358·Unknown

Opinion

1 POWELL & ASSOCIATES 925 West Hedding Street 2 San Jose, California 95126 T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0201 3 E: admin@rrpassociates.com

4 Attorney for Plaintiff 5

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 ALEJANDRO ANDRES PEREZ, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-00358-KES-CDB 11 STIPULATION AND ORDER Plaintiff, 12 v. RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER AS MODIFIED

13 COUNTY OF KERN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 The parties hereto, by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate and 17 agree as follows: 18 1. The Protective Order as set forth in the following pages will be the Protective 19 Order applicable in this action with regard to potentially sensitive documents and 20 information the parties believe will be the subject of discovery in this proceeding, and may 21 also be subject in part to State and Federal statutes limiting public disclosure. 22 2. Defendant Eichhorst, has not yet answered upon service of the Complaint and 23 Summons in this action, but no interests of Ms. Eichhorst will be harmed or affected by the 24 Court authorizing the application of this Protective Order to this action, and Counsel for 25 // 26 // 27 28 - 1 - 1 Plaintiff shall ensure service of this filing upon Ms. Eichhorst when executed by the Court. 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 3 _/S/ Andrew C. Hamilton 08/26/2025 __/S/ Robert R. Powell __ 08/26/2025 4 ANDREW C. HAMILTON ROBERT R. POWELL Attorney - Kern County Defendants Attorney for Plaintiffs IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ August 26, 2025 | Wan D bh Christohper D. Baker, U.S. Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ff PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS/INFORMATION Case No.: 1:25-cv-00358-CDB Perez, et al., v. County of Kern, et al.

1 Perez v. County of Kern, et al. 2 Eastern District Court of California Case No. 1:25-cv-00358-CDB 3 I. DEFINITIONS 4 1) The “Action” or “Matter” as used herein, refers to the case of Perez et al v. 5 County of Kern et al, 1:25-cv-00358-CDB 6 2) The “Cases” for purposes of this Protective Order refers to Kern County Superior 7 Court Case No.’s JUV-0613699 & JD144416-00 (Alejandro Perez), AND, JUV- 8 0613699 & JD144417-00 (E.P.), and for purposes of the following Protective Order 9 terms and conditions specifically relates to the “juvenile case files” for the Cases as 10 the phrase “juvenile case files” is described by C.R.C. 5.552. Juvenile case files also 11 include for purposes of this Protective Order, any law enforcement related 12 WRITINGS (e.g. incident/police reports, audio and/or video footage or materials) 13 relating to Plaintiff Ashley Sinden, and also Alejandro Perez Jr. (deceased). Any 14 WRITINGS as that term is described at “4)” below, that are produced for reasons related to review or use in the Action from “juvenile case files” of the Cases are 15 presumptively “Confidential” as defined below. Regardless of any other terms of 16 this Protective Order, inclusive of “Confidential” defined in “4)” below, WRITINGS 17 that did not originate from or were created by persons who were employees or 18 contractors or administrative sub-units of the County of Kern are not presumptively 19 “Confidential.” The Resource Family Approval file for Margaret Eichhorst is 20 presumptively “Confidential.” 21 3) “Challenging Party” for purposes this Protective Order refers to a Party or Non- 22 Party that challenges the designation of information or items as “Confidential” under 23 this Order by another party. 24 4) “Confidential” and/or “Confidential Information” for purposes of this Protective 25 Order refers to WRITINGS as that term is defined by California Evid. Code 250, and 26 further includes the kinds of materials and other tangible items and information in 27 28 - 3 - 1 various forms as described in FRCP 34(a)(1)(a), that may qualify as Protected 2 Material and/or have been designated “Confidential” by a Party or Non-Party. 3 5) “Counsel” for purposes this Protective Order refers to attorneys of record in the 4 Action and their affiliated attorneys, paralegals, clerical, and secretarial staff who are 5 actively involved in prosecuting or defending in the Action. Should any non-lawyer (eg. an expert or consultant for an attorney/party) be given access to Confidential 6 Materials the Counsel that provides those Confidential Materials to the Non-Party 7 person or entity shall advise the recipient(s) in writing that such materials are being 8 disclosed pursuant to, and subject to the terms of this Protective Order, shall provide 9 the recipient(s) with a copy of this Protective Order, and shall expressly advise the 10 recipient(s) that they may not be disclosed other than pursuant to the terms of this 11 Protective Order. 12 5) “Designating Party” for purposes this Protective Order refers to a Party or Non- 13 Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in 14 responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 15 6) “Disclosure or Discovery Material” for purposes this Protective Order refers to all 16 WRITINGS as that term is defined above that are produced or provided from one or 17 more parties to one or more other parties in this litigation which are protected from 18 public disclosure under a specifically applicable State or Federal Law. 19 7) “Expert” for purposes of this Protective Order is defined as a person with 20 specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the Action who has been 21 retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant for 22 the Action; Experts hired for consultation or retention in the Action may be provided 23 Protected Material and Confidential Information provided terms of I(5) above are complied with. 24 8) “Non-Party” for purposes of this Protective Order refers to any natural person, 25 partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to the 26 Action. 27 28 - 4 - 1 9) “Party” for purposes of this Protective Order refers to any party Plaintiff or 2 Defendant in the Action, including in the case of an entity or governmental 3 administrative sub-unit, all of its/their officers, directors, employees, consultants, 4 Experts and support staff. 5 10) “Producing Party” for purposes this Protective Order refers to a Party or Non- Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in the Action. 6 11 ) “Professional Vendor” for purposes this Protective Order refers to persons or 7 entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, 8 translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or 9 retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 10 12) “Protected Materials” for purposes of the following provisions refers to any 11 Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” by a 12 Designating Party. 13 13) “Receiving Party” for purposes of this Protective Order refers to a Party that 14 receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 15 II. SCOPE 16 1) The protections conferred by this Protective Order cover not only Protected 17 Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from 18 Protected Material; 19 2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; 20 3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that 21 might reveal Protected Material. 22 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial 23 judge; this Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. III.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. County of Kern, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Perez v. County of Kern (Perez v. County of Kern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.