Perez v. Coughlin

202 A.D.2d 1056, 610 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3485
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination that petitioner violated rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i]) by possessing a razor blade in his cell is supported by substantial evidence (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130). The written misbehavior report stated that a razor blade was found secreted behind a picture in a photo album in petitioner’s cell. At a Tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner entered a plea of guilty. Petitioner admitted possessing the razor blade and stated that he used it only to cut cardboard and sharpen pencils and did not use it as a weapon. Petitioner’s statements, along with the written misbehavior report, were sufficient to support the determination.

Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, the penalty of 120 days in the Special Housing Unit was not an abuse of discretion under [1057]*1057the circumstances. (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Griffith, J.) Present —Denman, P. J., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. Coughlin, 202 A.D.2d 1056, 610 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 1056 (Perez v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allah v. Selsky
265 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Sparks v. Coombe
243 A.D.2d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)