Perez v. City of Miami
This text of 358 So. 2d 1132 (Perez v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mario PEREZ, II, and Hilda Perez, His Wife, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF MIAMI, Allan Poms, Lester C. Pancoast, Bouterse Borelli Albaisa Architects Planners, Inc., De Zarraga & Donnell, Inc., and Volkert Associates, Inc., a Joint Venture, the Stuyvesant Insurance Company, American Employers Insurance Company, First State Insurance Company, Houston General Insurance Company, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Dan G. Wheeler, Miami, for appellants.
Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl, James E. Tribble, Arky, Freed, Stearns, Watson & Greer, Alison W. Miller, Goodwin, Ryskamp, Welcher & Carrier, Knight, Peters, Pickle, Noemoeller & Flynn, Jeanne Heyward, Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood, Steven R. Berger and Bette Ellen Quiat, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.) and PARKER, J. GWYNN (Ret.), Associate Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs have appealed from summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants. On consideration thereof in light of the record, briefs and argument, we have concluded there are presented genuine issues of material fact relating to the status and duties of defendants as bearing on the *1133 question of liability which properly may not be resolved by summary judgment.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
358 So. 2d 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-city-of-miami-fladistctapp-1978.