Perez v. Byrd
682 So. 2d 643, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11414, 1996 WL 631697
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 1996
DocketNo. 96-307
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 682 So. 2d 643 (Perez v. Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Perez v. Byrd, 682 So. 2d 643, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11414, 1996 WL 631697 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
The only meritorious issue raised is the correctness of the trial court’s order granting mistrial based upon a witness’s statement indicating that the Plaintiff had received a traffic citation. The trial court found that the gratuitous comment was a clear implication of the Plaintiffs fault and granted a mistrial. We affirm. See Spanagel v. Love, 585 So.2d 317 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Whigum v. Heilig-Meyers Furniture Inc.
682 So. 2d 643 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
682 So. 2d 643, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11414, 1996 WL 631697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-byrd-fladistctapp-1996.