Perez v. Byrd
682 So. 2d 643, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11414, 1996 WL 631697
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1996·No. No. 96-307·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The only meritorious issue raised is the correctness of the trial court’s order granting mistrial based upon a witness’s statement indicating that the Plaintiff had received a traffic citation. The trial court found that the gratuitous comment was a clear implication of the Plaintiffs fault and granted a mistrial. We affirm. See Spanagel v. Love, 585 So.2d 317 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perez v. Byrd, 682 So. 2d 643, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11414, 1996 WL 631697 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
682 So. 2d 643 (Perez v. Byrd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whigum v. Heilig-Meyers Furniture Inc.
682 So. 2d 643 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)