Perez v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis
895 S.W.2d 264, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 469
Opinion
ORDER
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s sustaining of defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this breach of contract action. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Defendant’s motion for damages pursuant to Rule 84.19 is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perez v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis, 895 S.W.2d 264, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 469 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
895 S.W.2d 264 (Perez v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.