Perez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
927 P.2d 1121, 145 Or. App. 252, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1850
Opinion
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision establishing conditions of post-prison supervision, including a declaration that petitioner is a predatory sex offender. ORS 181.585 to ORS 181.589.
Petitioner’s arguments are resolved contrary to his position by our decisions in Schuch v. Board of Parole, 139 Or App 327, 912 P2d 403, rev den 324 Or 78 (1996), and Gress v. Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7, 924 P2d 329, on recons 144 Or App 375, 927 P2d 138 (1996).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 927 P.2d 1121, 145 Or. App. 252, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1850 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
927 P.2d 1121 (Perez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schuch v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
912 P.2d 403 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
924 P.2d 329 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
927 P.2d 138 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)