Perez v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 JOSEPH PEREZ, Case No. 2:18-cv-02077-KJD-VCF 12 Petitioner, ORDER 13 v. 14 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 15 Respondent. 16
17 18 Respondents having filed an unopposed motion for enlargement of time (fourth request). 19 ECF No. 41. The court finds good cause to grant the motion. 20 Respondents also have filed a motion for leave to file exhibit under seal. ECF No. 44. 21 The exhibit in question is a psychological evaluation of petitioner, which contains confidential 22 information. The court finds that compelling reasons exist to seal this exhibit. See Kamakana v. 23 City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). 24 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that respondents' unopposed motion for enlargement of 25 time (fourth request) (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents motion for leave to file exhibit under seal 2 | (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED. ° DATED: November 1, 2021 hat 4 KENT J. DAWSON 5 United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perez v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada (Perez v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.