Perez v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided November 1, 2021·No. 2:18-cv-02077·Unknown

Opinion

JOSEPH PEREZ, Case No. 2:18-cv-02077-KJD-VCF Petitioner, ORDER v. OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Respondents having filed an unopposed motion for enlargement of time (fourth request). ECF No. 41. The court finds good cause to grant the motion. Respondents also have filed a motion for leave to file exhibit under seal. ECF No. 44. The exhibit in question is a psychological evaluation of petitioner, which contains confidential information. The court finds that compelling reasons exist to seal this exhibit. See Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that respondents' unopposed motion for enlargement of time (fourth request) (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED. /// /// /// IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents motion for leave to file exhibit under seal (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED. ° DATED: November 1, 2021 hat KENT J. DAWSON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, (D. Nev. 2021).

Perez v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada (Perez v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)