Perez-Soto v. Mukasey
This text of 271 F. App'x 666 (Perez-Soto v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Fermín Perez-Soto, a native and citizen of Cuba, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absen-tia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Perez-Soto’s motion to reopen for failure to establish exceptional circumstances where Perez-Soto contended that he misunderstood or was confused as to the time of the scheduled hearing, the submitted evidence of his medical conditions predated the hearing by more than a decade, and Perez-Soto sought to reopen in order to seek relief under the Convention Against Torture. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(l) (“exceptional circumstances” include those beyond the alien’s control, such as the serious illness of the alien, or the death or serious illness of an immediate relative, but not less compelling circumstances); Valencia-Fragoso v. INS, 321 F.3d 1204, 1205-06 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam) (confusion as to time of scheduled hearing did not amount to exceptional circumstances where the in absentia order did not lead to unconscionable result).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 F. App'x 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-soto-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.