Perez-Sanchez v. State

116 So. 3d 599, 2013 WL 3197249, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10089
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 2013·No. No. 3D12-341·Published

Opinion

ROTHENBERG, J.

The defendant, Victoriano Perez-Sanchez, appeals the trial court’s final order of revocation of probation. We affirm, but remand with directions to enter a corrected order of revocation of probation.

Having reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by both parties, we find that the defendant’s arguments concerning the revocation of his probation are without merit. We, therefore, affirm the trial court’s order revoking the defendant’s probation.

However, we agree with the defendant that the written order of revocation of probation must be corrected to accurately reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncements at the revocation hearing. We, therefore, remand with directions to enter a corrected order deleting the finding that the defendant willfully violated the following conditions of probation: (1) failure to report; (3) failure to pay drug fees; and (12) unlawful contact with the victim. Laffitte v. State, 16 So.3d 315, 316 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Affirmed, but remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez-Sanchez v. State, 116 So. 3d 599, 2013 WL 3197249, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10089 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

116 So. 3d 599 (Perez-Sanchez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laffitte v. State
16 So. 3d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)