Perez Perez v. Escobar Construction, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedAugust 22, 2024
Docket1:20-cv-08010
StatusUnknown

This text of Perez Perez v. Escobar Construction, Inc. (Perez Perez v. Escobar Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perez Perez v. Escobar Construction, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x

MARCO ANTONIO PEREZ PEREZ and JOSE EDUARDO SANCHEZ ARIAS,

Plaintiffs,

-v- No. 20-CV-8010-LTS-GWG

ESCOBAR CONSTRUCTION, INC., et. al.,

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein’s June 9, 2023, Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) (docket entry no. 275) which recommends that the Court grant Defendants’ motion to “decertify” the collective action and to dismiss the claims of the opt-in plaintiffs without prejudice. (Docket entry no. 247.) No objections to the Report have been received. In reviewing a report and recommendation, a district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate [judge].” 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(C) (Westlaw through Pub. Law 117-12). “In a case such as this one, where no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Johnson v. New York University School of Education, No. 00-CV-8117- WK-RLE, 2003 WL 21433443, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2003). The Court has reviewed carefully Magistrate Judge Gorenstein’s thorough and well- reasoned Report and Recommendation and finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to decertify the collective action and to dismiss the claims of the opt-in plaintiffs without prejudice is granted. This Order resolves docket entry no. 247. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the case caption as indicated above and Plaintiff’s counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order on each of the opt-in plaintiffs and file proof of such service within 7 days of the date hereof. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain August 22, 2024 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Perez Perez v. Escobar Construction, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-perez-v-escobar-construction-inc-nysd-2024.