Perez-Limon v. Ashcroft
This text of 88 F. App'x 990 (Perez-Limon v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
This appeal arises out of the BIA’s streamlined approval of the INS’ removal order against petitioner Ana Maria PerezLimon and denial of Perez’s application for Cancellation of Removal. Perez raises the following issues on appeal: 1) whether the BIA’s streamlining procedure at 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7)(iii) (2000) comports with the due process requirements of the Fifth Amendment, and 2) whether the regulation, if constitutional, was properly applied to Perez’s case. In turn, the government challenges our jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision to apply streamlining procedures to Perez’s case. Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845 (9th Cir.2003), forecloses Perez’s arguments. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision to apply streamlining procedures to Perez’s case, id. at 853-54, and the BIA’s streamlining regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7)(iii) (2000) comports with due process, id. at 850.
Accordingly, we DISMISS Perez’s challenge to the BIA’s application of streamlining procedures to her case and DENY the petition with respect to the due process challenge.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 F. App'x 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-limon-v-ashcroft-ca9-2004.