Perez-Enriquez v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 13, 2005·No. 03-70244·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIME PEREZ-ENRIQUEZ,  Petitioner, No. 03-70244 v.  Agency No. A92-002-074 ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed June 14, 2005

Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and William O. Bertelsman,** Senior Judge.

OPINION

The panel’s September 9, 2004, opinion is withdrawn. The new opinion is filed concurrently with this order. The petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. The parties may file a new petition for rehearing or suggestion for rehearing en banc as provided for by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40.

*Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). **The Honorable William O. Bertelsman, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

7029 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez-Enriquez v. Gonzales, (9th Cir. 2005).

Perez-Enriquez v. Gonzales (Perez-Enriquez v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.