Perez Crabbe v. R Street Self Storage
This text of Perez Crabbe v. R Street Self Storage (Perez Crabbe v. R Street Self Storage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________ ) LIDIA EMELINDA PEREZ CRABBE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1702 (RWR) ) R STREET SELF STORAGE, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 28, 2012, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. Because a
ruling on the motion to dismiss potentially could dispose of this case, the Court advised the
plaintiff in its January 4, 2013 Order of her obligation to file an opposition or other response to
the motion, among other things. Further, that Order expressly warned the plaintiff that, if she
failed to file her opposition by February 1, 2013, the Court would treat the motion as conceded.
The plaintiff has neither filed an opposition nor requested additional time to do so. The Court
will treat the defendant’s motion as conceded and dismiss the case.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Signed this 8th day of February, 2013.
/s/ RICHARD W. ROBERTS United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Perez Crabbe v. R Street Self Storage, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-crabbe-v-r-street-self-storage-dcd-2013.