Perez-Cortez v. Mukasey
This text of 288 F. App'x 331 (Perez-Cortez v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order af-[332]*332fii’ming the pretermission of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
The BIA found petitioner ineligible for cancellation of removal because his conviction under California Penal Code § 273.5(a) was for a crime of domestic violence under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)®.
Petitioner does not dispute that he has been convicted under California Penal Code § 273.5(a) for willful infliction of corporal injury on a spouse or cohabitant, or that his conviction constitutes a crime of domestic violence under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)®. Further, because petitioner’s conviction for a crime of domestic violence rendered him ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(C), the BIA did not need to reach the issue of whether petitioner could establish good moral character or continuous physical presence for purposes of cancellation of removal. Cf. Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. Ashcroft, 390 F.3d 649, 653 (9th Cir.2004). Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted.
This court lacks jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of petitioner’s application for voluntary departure. See Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 F. App'x 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-cortez-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.