Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Perez-Castillo v. State

Perez-Castillo v. State

562 S.E.2d 184, 275 Ga. 124, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 1163, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 323
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 15, 2002
DocketS02A0227
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 562 S.E.2d 184 (Perez-Castillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perez-Castillo v. State, 562 S.E.2d 184, 275 Ga. 124, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 1163, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 323 (Ga. 2002).

Opinion

Sears, Presiding Justice.

Appellant Edwin Perez-Castillo appeals his conviction for trafficking in more than 50 pounds of marijuana. 1 Following the jury’s guilty verdict, the trial court entered its judgment of conviction and sentence. Appellant then filed alternative motions for a new trial or to arrest the judgment. In his motion to arrest the judgment, appellant raised for the first time several constitutional challenges to the criminal statute under which he was convicted, OCGA § 16-13-31. The trial court denied both of appellant’s post-conviction motions, and he appeals to this Court, seeking to invoke our exclusive jurisdiction over unresolved questions surrounding the constitutionality of a statute. 2

The State urges that this Court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and that it must be transferred to the Court of *125 Appeals. We agree. It is well-established that a criminal defendant may not initiate a constitutional attack against a statute in either a motion for a new trial 3 or a motion to arrest the judgment. 4 A constitutional attack on a state statute “ ‘must be made at the first opportunity, and it is too late to raise such question after a guilty verdict has been returned by the jury.’ ” 5 Because appellant waited until filing his motion to arrest the judgment — well after his conviction — to raise his constitutional challenges to OCGA § 16-13-31, those challenges must be deemed waived on appeal.

Decided April 15, 2002. Clark & Towne, Wystan B. Getz, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Gregory D. McKeithen, Donald Geary, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

There being no other issues germane to this appeal that vest it within this Court’s jurisdiction, it is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeals.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.
1

OCGA § 16-13-31 (c).

2

Ga. Const. (1983), Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II.

3

Kolokouris v. State, 271 Ga. 597 (523 SE2d 311) (1999).

4

Hardeman v. State, 272 Ga. 361 (529 SE2d 368) (2000).

5

Hardeman, 272 Ga. at 362, quoting Brackett v. State, 227 Ga. 493 (181 SE2d 380) (1971).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sherron Burrell v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2020
Amos v. State
783 S.E.2d 900 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)
Chestnut v. the State
769 S.E.2d 779 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)
Alethea Graham v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015
Graham v. State
769 S.E.2d 753 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)
Williams v. State
757 S.E.2d 267 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Cynthia Mack Pierce v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013
Pierce v. State
743 S.E.2d 438 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Vince Smart v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012
Smart v. State
732 S.E.2d 850 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
Brinkley v. State
728 S.E.2d 598 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
Rooney v. State
690 S.E.2d 804 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Brown v. State
683 S.E.2d 581 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Craven v. State
664 S.E.2d 921 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Goldsby v. State
615 S.E.2d 592 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)
Woods v. State
608 S.E.2d 631 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2005)
Robles v. State
589 S.E.2d 566 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Christopher v. State
585 S.E.2d 107 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
562 S.E.2d 184, 275 Ga. 124, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 1163, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-castillo-v-state-ga-2002.