Perevit v. Bilous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Perevit v. Bilous

275 A.D.2d 940

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 940 (Perevit v. Bilous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perevit v. Bilous, 275 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Assuming that the evidence was sufficient to justify an inference that decedent was struck by the truck owned by defendant Bilous and operated by defendant Coteaux, it is not sufficient to justify a further inference that the contact was due to the negligence of the operator of the truck. (Wieland v. Third Ave. Tr. Corp., 296 N. Y. 1047.) Present— Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assuming that the evidence was sufficient to justify an inference that decedent was struck by the truck owned by defendant Bilous and operated by defendant Coteaux, it is not sufficient to justify a further inference that the contact was due to the negligence of the operator of the truck. (Wieland v. Third Ave. Tr. Corp., 296 N. Y. 1047.) Present— Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perevit-v-bilous-nyappdiv-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack