Peretz v. Peretz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Peretz v. Peretz

1 Mart. 219

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 1, 1811

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Mart. 219 (Peretz v. Peretz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peretz v. Peretz, 1 Mart. 219 (La. 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The suit is rightly brought.

[220]*220The Spanish authority, cited by the plaintiff’s counsel, fully supports him. The rule is the same in the courts of equity in the United States and in the court of chancery in England, which the practice is according to the rules of the civil law. If a debt be joint and several, each of the debtors must be brought before the court. Madox vs. Jackson, 3 Atkins, 406. All concerned in the demand ought to be made parties. 2 Ventris, 348.

Action Sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The suit is rightly brought.

[220]*220The Spanish authority, cited by the plaintiff’s counsel, fully supports him. The rule is the same in the courts of equity in the United States and in the court of chancery in England, which the practice is according to the rules of the civil law. If a debt be joint and several, each of the debtors must be brought before the court. Madox vs. Jackson, 3 Atkins, 406. All concerned in the demand ought to be made parties. 2 Ventris, 348.

Action Sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Mart. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peretz-v-peretz-la-1811.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack