Perera v. Miller

662 S.E.2d 544, 283 Ga. 583, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 1841, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 445
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 2, 2008·No. S08A0897·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

SEARS, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Emily Perera, is the defendant in a pending murder case in Douglas County. She filed this pre-trial habeas action, contending that she was receiving ineffective assistance of trial counsel and that her constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated. However, because Perera may raise these issues in the pending criminal action, she may not raise them pursuant to a petition for writ of habeas corpus. 1 For this reason, the habeas court did not err in dismissing Perera’s petition without an evidentiary hearing. 2

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.
1

Mungin v. St. Lawrence, 281 Ga. 671 (641 SE2d 541) (2007); Kearse v. Paulk, 264 Ga. 509, 509-510 (448 SE2d 369) (1994).

2

See Mungin, 281 Ga. 671 (where habeas court is able to determine from face of the petition that it is without merit, it may dismiss without a hearing).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perera v. Miller, 662 S.E.2d 544, 283 Ga. 583, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 1841, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 445 (Ga. 2008).

662 S.E.2d 544 (Perera v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daker v. Sapp
S.D. Georgia, 2019
Williams v. Reece
701 S.E.2d 188 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Thomas v. Freeman
695 S.E.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Smith v. Brown
686 S.E.2d 760 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Massey v. St. Lawrence
671 S.E.2d 834 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)