Perelman, J. v. Perelman, R. of Dilsworth
This text of Perelman, J. v. Perelman, R. of Dilsworth (Perelman, J. v. Perelman, R. of Dilsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
JEFFREY E. PERELMAN, AND JEP : No. 65 MAL 2016 MANAGEMENT, INC., AS EQUITABLE : SUBROGEE OF JEFFREY E. : PERELMAN : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : RAYMOND G. PERELMAN; DILWORTH : PAXSON, LLP: JOSEPH JACOVINI; : LAWRENCE MCMICHAEL; MARJORIE : OBOD; RONALD PERELMAN; HAINES & : ASSOCIATES; CLIFFORD E. HAINES; : BUCKLEY, BRION, MCGUIRE, MORRIS : & SOMMER LLP; ANDREW C. ECKERT; : SIGMUND FLECK; GUNSTER, YOAKLEY : & STEWART, P.A.; AND GEORGE S. : LEMIEUX : : : PETITION OF: DILWORTH PAXSON LLP, : JOSEPH JACOVINI, LAWRENCE : MCMICHAEL AND MARJORIE OBOD
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
and Application for Leave to File Reply Brief are DENIED.
Justices Donohue and Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision
of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Perelman, J. v. Perelman, R. of Dilsworth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perelman-j-v-perelman-r-of-dilsworth-pa-2016.