Perel & Lowenstein, Inc. v. Commissioner

237 F.2d 908
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 23, 1956·No. Nos. 12752, 12753·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although the petitioner corporation’s president suffered a stroke resulting in paralysis and loss of the power of speech in 1949, the petitioner continued to pay him a $30,000 salary in each of the following two years, and a salary of $24,-000 the third year. Deductions made by the petitioner for these payments were disallowed in their entirety by the respondent Commissioner. The Tax Court found that, “A reasonable allowance for compensation for the personal services actually rendered by Perel, as well as for compensation for past services actually rendered, was not more than $10,000” for each of the years involved, and accordingly redetermined the asserted deficiencies. A careful review of the record leaves us unconvinced that this dis-positive finding of fact was clearly erroneous.

The decision of the Tax Court therefore must be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perel & Lowenstein, Inc. v. Commissioner, 237 F.2d 908 (6th Cir. 1956).

237 F.2d 908 (Perel & Lowenstein, Inc. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John C. Nordt Co. v. Commissioner
46 T.C. 431 (U.S. Tax Court, 1966)