Pereira v. State Road Department

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pereira v. State Road Department

224 So. 2d 436, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5542

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 1969·No. No. L-75·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having- been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Moore v. State Road Department (Fla.App.1965), 171 So.2d 25; Carmazi v. Board of County Commissioners of Dade County (Fla.App.1959), 108 So.2d 318; Duval Engineering and Contracting Company v. Sales (Fla.1955), 77 So.2d 431; Paty v. Town of Palm Beach (1947), 158 Fla. 575, 29 So.2d 363.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having- been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Moore v. State Road Department (Fla.App.1965), 171 So.2d 25; Carmazi v. Board of County Commissioners of Dade County (Fla.App.1959), 108 So.2d 318; Duval Engineering and Contracting Company v. Sales (Fla.1955), 77 So.2d 431; Paty v. Town of Palm Beach (1947), 158 Fla. 575, 29 So.2d 363.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Pereira v. State Road Department, 224 So. 2d 436, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5542 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

224 So. 2d 436 (Pereira v. State Road Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related