Pereira v. Ralphs Grocery Co.
This text of 329 F. App'x 134 (Pereira v. Ralphs Grocery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
MEMORANDUM
The defendant’s “voluntary cessation of allegedly illegal conduct” did not moot this case. United States v. W.T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 632, 73 S.Ct. 891, 97 L.Ed. 1303 (1953). The plaintiff has standing to challenge “all barriers” at Ralphs that are related to his disability, not just those identified in the F & F Report. Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 524 F.3d 1034, 1047 (9th Cir.2008).
REVERSED & REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 F. App'x 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pereira-v-ralphs-grocery-co-ca9-2009.