Perego v. Robinson

377 So. 2d 834
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1979
DocketLL-243/T1-10
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 377 So. 2d 834 (Perego v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perego v. Robinson, 377 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

377 So.2d 834 (1979)

Thomas PEREGO, Appellant,
v.
John Spencer ROBINSON and Robert L. Hannah, Appellees.

No. LL-243/T1-10.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

December 19, 1979.

Joseph DeGance of Jansen & DeGance, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

John Spencer Robinson, Daytona Beach, for appellee, John Spencer Robinson.

No appearance for appellee, Robert L. Hannah.

PER CURIAM.

On April 17, 1979, the District Court of Appeal, First District, entered its order requiring *835 the Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, because it appeared from the record that the notice of appeal had not been timely filed. Appellant has filed affidavits to explain the apparent late filing of the notice. This appeal was subsequently transferred to this Court.

The record is clear that the Notice of Appeal was not filed in the office of the Clerk of the Court until after the appeal time had run. The office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Volusia County is at the county seat in DeLand. No documents are filed or recorded elsewhere, nor can they be. Article VIII, Sec. 1(k), Florida Constitution. The Notice of Appeal was left with a deputy clerk in Daytona Beach and from there transmitted to DeLand, where it did not arrive until after the time for appeal had run. Under these circumstances, it cannot be considered "filed" within the time allowed. Rule 9.110, Fla.R. App.P. This is equivalent to filing in the wrong court. See: Southeast First National Bank of Miami v. Herin, 357 So.2d 716 (Fla. 1978); Estate of Hatcher, 270 So.2d 45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972).

The appeal is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DAUKSCH, C.J., and ORFINGER and UPCHURCH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoffman v. Hoffman
485 So. 2d 1282 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Sanchez v. Swanson
481 So. 2d 481 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Hoffman v. Hoffman
463 So. 2d 517 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Sanchez v. Swanson
461 So. 2d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Hawks v. Walker
409 So. 2d 524 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 So. 2d 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perego-v-robinson-fladistctapp-1979.