Perego v. Robinson

344 So. 2d 316, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15616

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: April 13, 1977
• Docket: No. BB-20
• Status: Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is axiomatic that by summary judgment a trial court may not resolve issues of material fact and that summary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial. The rules applicable to entry of summary judgment have been repeatedly recited in prior opinions of this court and nothing will be added to the jurisprudence of the State of Florida by repetition. (See Connell v. Sledge, 306 So.2d 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. dism. 336 So.2d 105 (Fla.1976); Forrest v. Carter, 308 So.2d 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) and Burlingham v. Allen, 317 So.2d 781 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

REVERSED.

BOYER, C. J., and McCORD, J., concur. RAWLS, J., dissents.