Perea v. Bush

Fifth Circuit

Perea v. Bush

96 F. App'x 240

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2004·No. 03-21091·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Guy Ralph Perea and Tammy Dawn Perea, who are apparently a husband and wife and also state prisoners in California, filed this action in federal district court in Texas under the habeas corpus statutes. The district court dismissed the case, correctly concluding that personal jurisdiction was lacking. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); In re Green, 39 F.3d 582, 583 (5th Cir.1994).

Because the Pereas offer no factual or legal basis for challenging this conclusion, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.3.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM. *

Guy Ralph Perea and Tammy Dawn Perea, who are apparently a husband and wife and also state prisoners in California, filed this action in federal district court in Texas under the habeas corpus statutes. The district court dismissed the case, correctly concluding that personal jurisdiction was lacking. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); In re Green, 39 F.3d 582, 583 (5th Cir.1994).

Because the Pereas offer no factual or legal basis for challenging this conclusion, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.3.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Perea v. Bush, 96 F. App'x 240 (5th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

96 F. App'x 240 (Perea v. Bush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related