Perea v. Bush
This text of 96 F. App'x 240 (Perea v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Guy Ralph Perea and Tammy Dawn Perea, who are apparently a husband and wife and also state prisoners in California, filed this action in federal district court in Texas under the habeas corpus statutes. The district court dismissed the case, correctly concluding that personal jurisdiction was lacking. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); In re Green, 39 F.3d 582, 583 (5th Cir.1994).
Because the Pereas offer no factual or legal basis for challenging this conclusion, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.3.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 F. App'x 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perea-v-bush-ca5-2004.