Pere v. 1470-1488 U & R Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Pere v. 1470-1488 U & R Inc.

732 N.E.2d 947, 95 N.Y.2d 782, 710 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 1013

DecidedMay 11, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 732 N.E.2d 947 (Pere v. 1470-1488 U & R Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pere v. 1470-1488 U & R Inc., 732 N.E.2d 947, 95 N.Y.2d 782, 710 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 1013 (N.Y. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the Supreme Court order directing the corporation to pay funds in satisfaction of a prior judgment against Regina Tischler, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine a proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the Supreme Court order directing the corporation to pay funds in satisfaction of a prior judgment against Regina Tischler, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine a proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

732 N.E.2d 947, 95 N.Y.2d 782, 710 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pere-v-1470-1488-u-r-inc-ny-2000.