Perdue v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Perdue v. State

92 So. 510, 18 Ala. App. 395, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 90

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 7, 1922·No. 4 Div. 721.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment which charged that he did carnally know or abuse in the attempt to carnally know a girl over the age of 12 and under the age of 16 years, and his punishment fixed by the jury at 2 years in the penitentiary.

It appears that judgment was rendered in this case on May 13, 1921, and that the bill of exception was approved on November 7, 1921. It does not appear when the bill of exceptions was presented. It not appearing that the bill of exceptions was presented in 90 days, the same cannot be considered.

We have examined the record and find no reversible error. The judgment of eonvic- / tion is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment which charged that he did carnally know or abuse in the attempt to carnally know a girl over the age of 12 and under the age of 16 years, and his punishment fixed by the jury at 2 years in the penitentiary.

It appears that judgment was rendered in this case on May 13, 1921, and that the bill of exception was approved on November 7, 1921. It does not appear when the bill of exceptions was presented. It not appearing that the bill of exceptions was presented in 90 days, the same cannot be considered.

We have examined the record and find no reversible error. The judgment of eonvic- / tion is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Perdue v. State, 92 So. 510, 18 Ala. App. 395, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 90 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

92 So. 510 (Perdue v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related