Perdices v. Perdices

959 So. 2d 297, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5647, 2007 WL 1135687
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 2007
DocketNo. 3D06-1760
StatusPublished

This text of 959 So. 2d 297 (Perdices v. Perdices) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perdices v. Perdices, 959 So. 2d 297, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5647, 2007 WL 1135687 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 61.13(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006); Edrington v. Edrington, 945 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edrington v. Edrington
945 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
959 So. 2d 297, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5647, 2007 WL 1135687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perdices-v-perdices-fladistctapp-2007.