Percy v. Millaudon

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Percy v. Millaudon

12 La. 271

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 15, 1838

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 12 La. 271 (Percy v. Millaudon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Percy v. Millaudon, 12 La. 271 (La. 1838).

Pincite

Opinion

Martin, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiffs and appellees ask the dismissal of the appeal, on the ground that they have not all been regularly cited. , „ , , , . . „ . . Several of them have not been cited at all. The citation of Brown was not served, as the sheriff says, because he could not be found. It ought to have been served on his attorney in the suit. That of Pierre Foucher was left at the domieil of Delachaise.

The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiffs and appellees ask the dismissal of the appeal, on the ground that they have not all been regularly cited. , „ , , , . . „ . . Several of them have not been cited at all. The citation of Brown was not served, as the sheriff says, because he could not be found. It ought to have been served on his attorney in the suit. That of Pierre Foucher was left at the domieil of Delachaise.

The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 La. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/percy-v-millaudon-la-1838.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack