Percy v. Millaudon

12 La. 271
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1838·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Martin, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiffs and appellees ask the dismissal of the appeal, on the ground that they have not all been regularly cited. , „ , , , . . „ . . Several of them have not been cited at all. The citation of Brown was not served, as the sheriff says, because he could not be found. It ought to have been served on his attorney in the suit. That of Pierre Foucher was left at the domieil of Delachaise.

The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Percy v. Millaudon, 12 La. 271 (La. 1838).

12 La. 271 (Percy v. Millaudon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Comire v. Schiro Amusement Co.
6 La. App. 441 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
Swearingen v. McDaniel
12 La. 203 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1845)
Moore v. Rutherford
3 Rob. 60 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1842)