Percy v. Cohalan

2 A.D.2d 867, 156 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4121

This text of 2 A.D.2d 867 (Percy v. Cohalan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Percy v. Cohalan, 2 A.D.2d 867, 156 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. We may not consider on this appeal the affidavits submitted by the appellant upon the argument of the appeal. They were not before the Special Term when it considered the application herein. In its decision the Special Term stated that no facts were presented to it for determination. In view of the record, that conclusion was proper (Matter of Shaeffer, 237 App. Div. 278). This ease is, therefore, to be distinguished from Matter of Belford v. Board of Elections of Nassau County (306 N. Y. 70). Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Shaeffer
237 A.D. 278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Belford v. Board of Elections
115 N.E.2d 658 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.D.2d 867, 156 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/percy-v-cohalan-nyappdiv-1956.