Percy McDonald v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Robert Marshall v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Kevin Sullivan v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

503 F.2d 105, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7742
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJuly 9, 1974
Docket74-1219
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 503 F.2d 105 (Percy McDonald v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Robert Marshall v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Kevin Sullivan v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Percy McDonald v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Robert Marshall v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Kevin Sullivan v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, 503 F.2d 105, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7742 (7th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

503 F.2d 105

Percy McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Robert MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Kevin SULLIVAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 74-1219 to 74-1221.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued May 24, 1974.
Decided July 9, 1974.

Martin J. Dubowsky, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant.

John C. Tucker, Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellees.

Before PELL and STEVENS, Circuit Judges, and LARAMORE, Senior Judge.1

PER CURIAM.

This case comes before the court on appeal from an adverse judgment by Judge P. H. Marshall, entered in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, on March 14, 1974, denying appellants' motions for preliminary injunctions, granting defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissing plaintiffs' actions. Plaintiffs' cases were consolidated because they present similar facts and common questions of law concerning the amount of evidence a tax-supported institution of higher education must have in order to expel students for allegedly cheating on final examinations.

After considering the record, the briefs submitted to this court, and the oral arguments of counsel, we affirm and adopt the opinion of the District Court, 375 F.Supp. 95 (N.D.Ill.1974), as the opinion of this court.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court in this appeal is

Affirmed.

1

Senior Judge Don N. Laramore of the United States Court of Claims is sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicholas Hess v. Board of Trustees of Southern
839 F.3d 668 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
Reilly v. Daly
666 N.E.2d 439 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1996)
Taylor v. Maryland School for the Blind
409 F. Supp. 148 (D. Maryland, 1976)
Roller v. City of San Mateo
399 F. Supp. 358 (N.D. California, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 F.2d 105, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/percy-mcdonald-v-board-of-trustees-of-the-university-of-illinois-robert-ca7-1974.