Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander
194 F.2d 535
This text of 194 F.2d 535 (Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander, 194 F.2d 535 (6th Cir. 1952).
Opinion
Upon consideration of the briefs and record in the above-entitled causes and the oral arguments had therein, it appears that there are no reversible errors committed at the trial in rulings or instructions to the jury that were prejudicial, or m respect to which appropriate objections were preserved for review; therefore,
The judgment below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
194 F.2d 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/percy-badham-v-eugene-alexander-ca6-1952.