Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander

194 F.2d 535
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 20, 1952·No. 11447·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record in the above-entitled causes and the oral arguments had therein, it appears that there are no reversible errors committed at the trial in rulings or instructions to the jury that were prejudicial, or m respect to which appropriate objections were preserved for review; therefore,

The judgment below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander, 194 F.2d 535 (6th Cir. 1952).

194 F.2d 535 (Percy Badham v. Eugene Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.