Percival v. Hirzler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Percival v. Hirzler

254 A.D. 822, 5 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7777

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 25, 1938·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Dowling, J., [823]*823who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and the facts and for granting a new trial. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while a guest in defendants’ inn by reason of his being attacked by another patron in the inn.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Dowling, J., [823]*823who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and the facts and for granting a new trial. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while a guest in defendants’ inn by reason of his being attacked by another patron in the inn.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Percival v. Hirzler, 254 A.D. 822, 5 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 822 (Percival v. Hirzler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.