Home/New York Court of Appeals/Perchinsky v. State

Perchinsky v. State

689 N.E.2d 531, 91 N.Y.2d 830, 666 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4114
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion by Perchinsky, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the Court of Claims judgment and order in action No. 1, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion by Granny "G” Productions, Inc. for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine action No. 2 within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perchinsky v. State, 689 N.E.2d 531, 91 N.Y.2d 830, 666 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4114 (N.Y. 1997).

689 N.E.2d 531 (Perchinsky v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rooney v. Tyson
689 N.E.2d 532 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)