Perceval v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

35 Misc. 834, 72 N.Y.S. 1124

This text of 35 Misc. 834 (Perceval v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perceval v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 35 Misc. 834, 72 N.Y.S. 1124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is nothing in this case save a conflict of evidence, the preponderance being with the plaintiff.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Misc. 834, 72 N.Y.S. 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perceval-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1901.